fix: link rot
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b5be8da05
commit
15fed79726
21 changed files with 23 additions and 37 deletions
|
|
@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ title: FBI once again compares creating encryption back doors to putting a man o
|
|||
tags: ['politics', 'privacy']
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**[Chris Wray, FBI Director:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180721/12074340282/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Chris Wray, FBI Director:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/07/25/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> We're a country that has unbelievable innovation. We put a man on the moon. We have the power of flight. We have autonomous vehicles… [T]he idea that we can't solve this problem as a society -- I just don't buy it.<!-- excerpt -->
|
||||
|
||||
**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180721/12074340282/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/07/25/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> The "compromise" Wray wants is simple: if law enforcement has a warrant, it gets access. The solution isn't. To weaken or backdoor encryption to serve law enforcement's needs makes everyone -- not just criminal suspects -- less safe. If a hole can be used by good guys, it can be used by bad guys. And even the best guys can't prevent their tech tools from making their way into the public domain
|
||||
|
||||
**[Matt Blaze:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180721/12074340282/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Matt Blaze:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/07/25/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> "When I hear 'if we can put a man on the moon, we can do this' I'm hearing an analogy almost saying "if we can put a man on the moon, surely we can put a man on the sun.'"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ title: FCC calls community broadband an attack on free speech
|
|||
tag: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**[Techirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181029/08271540934/fcc-falsely-declares-community-broadband-ominous-attack-free-speech.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Techirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/10/30/fcc-falsely-declares-community-broadband-ominous-attack-free-speech/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> ... ISPs could prevent this by simply offering better, faster, and cheaper service. But it's far easier and cheaper to try and buy laws restricting consumer rights, and to have your favorite public official mindlessly demonize something that is, at the end of the day, a legitimate, organic public response to a broadband competition and availability problem ISPs like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast would prefer regulators ignore.<!-- excerpt -->
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ title: FCC chairman boosts telecom companies, throws Silicon Valley under the bu
|
|||
tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180904/09353340576/ajit-pai-coddles-big-telecom-demonizes-silicon-valley.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/09/05/ajit-pai-coddles-big-telecom-demonizes-silicon-valley/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> There's absolutely a legitimate conversation to be had here in terms of what to do about privacy and speech in the Facebook and Twitter era. And that may or may not involve crafting new regulations. But it might be nice if people wised up to the fact that a huge swath of the conversation is being dictated not by parties acting in good faith with a genuine eye on valid solutions, but by telecom monopolies eager to pee in the discourse pool simply to fatten their wallets.<!-- excerpt -->
|
||||
> ...
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
|
|||
|
||||
> The 12 lawsuits were filed by more than three dozen entities, including state attorneys general, consumer advocacy groups, and tech companies.
|
||||
|
||||
**[Karl Bode, techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180307/09452639377/telecom-lobbyists-whine-about-state-net-neutrality-efforts-they-helped-create.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Karl Bode, Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/03/12/telecom-lobbyists-whine-about-state-net-neutrality-efforts-they-helped-create/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> Granted having disparate state-level protections may in some ways be cumbersome, but that's again something ISPs like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast should have thought a little harder about before killing extremely popular and modest (by international standards) federal protections. Large ISP lobbyists created this mess and, unsurprisingly, they're simply refusing to own it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ title: The FCC sucks at repealing net neutrality
|
|||
tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**[Karl Bode, Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180314/10090139425/california-introduces-new-tougher-net-neutrality-rules-uses-ajit-pais-abdication-authority-against-fcc.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Karl Bode, Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/03/15/california-introduces-new-tougher-net-neutrality-rules-uses-ajit-pais-abdication-authority-against-fcc/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> ... the FCC shot itself in the foot, and when it neutered its own authority over ISPs at Comcast, AT&T and Verizon's behest, it managed to also neuter its authority to pre-empt states from filling the void. Of course this could all be moot if the FCC loses its battle in court, but it's amusing all the same, and it's another example of how Ajit Pai and friends didn't really think this whole thing through.<!-- excerpt -->
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ title: Net neutrality is repealed as the real fight for it begins
|
|||
tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180611/08382240010/net-neutrality-rules-die-today-backlash-is-just-getting-started.shtml)**
|
||||
**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/06/11/net-neutrality-rules-die-today-backlash-is-just-getting-started/)**
|
||||
|
||||
> So while many are understandably frustrated today, the elimination of the FCC's 2015 rules shouldn't be seen the end of net neutrality, or the end of the road. It's more like another chapter in a story that has neither a beginning nor an end. Net neutrality isn't something that simply "ends" with the creation or elimination of government guidelines. Net neutrality violations are only a symptom of a lack of competition in broadband and decades of regulatory capture.<!-- excerpt -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Reference in a new issue