fix: excerpt
This commit is contained in:
parent
3593ca9c43
commit
1f22024597
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: 'Of course AI is extractive, everything is lately'
|
||||||
description: "It's easy to pick on AI, because, well, it's costing a whole lot and providing, at best, dubious benefits. One of the easiest criticisms to lob at it is that it's extractive — whether you're pointing at public knowledge, creative work or resources and I think that's all quite fair. But it's not unique to AI and it's not particularly unique to the tech industry."
|
description: "It's easy to pick on AI, because, well, it's costing a whole lot and providing, at best, dubious benefits. One of the easiest criticisms to lob at it is that it's extractive — whether you're pointing at public knowledge, creative work or resources and I think that's all quite fair. But it's not unique to AI and it's not particularly unique to the tech industry."
|
||||||
tags: ['tech', 'AI']
|
tags: ['tech', 'AI']
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
It's easy to pick on AI, because, well, it's costing a whole lot and providing, at best, dubious benefits. One of the easiest criticisms to lob at it is that it's extractive — whether you're pointing at public knowledge, creative work or resources and I think that's all quite fair. But it's not unique to AI and it's not particularly unique to the tech industry.<!— excerpt —>
|
It's easy to pick on AI, because, well, it's costing a whole lot and providing, at best, dubious benefits. One of the easiest criticisms to lob at it is that it's extractive — whether you're pointing at public knowledge, creative work or resources and I think that's all quite fair. But it's not unique to AI and it's not particularly unique to the tech industry.<!-- excerpt -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We seem to, hopefully, be able to place crypto in the rearview mirror[^1]. It was similarly extractive of energy and funneled money from well-meaning personal investors and users to owners, investors and advocates that were already rich.
|
We seem to, hopefully, be able to place crypto in the rearview mirror[^1]. It was similarly extractive of energy and funneled money from well-meaning personal investors and users to owners, investors and advocates that were already rich.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue