fix: myriad typos and issues pt 2

src/posts/2018/avoiding-phishing.md

@@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ tags: ['security']
 
 **[Rob Dodson:](http://robdodson.me/avoid-phishing/)**
 
-> Someone just tried to phish me and it made me want to put together a little guide to help you catch this stuff before it ruins your day.
+> Someone just tried to phish me, and it made me want to put together a little guide to help you catch this stuff before it ruins your day.
 
 An excellent refresher on what to look out for to avoid phishing. Be careful out there.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/ca-net-neutrality-bill-makes-a-comeback.md

@@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
 
 **[Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1340051)**
 
-> "They want us to just trust them to protect net neutrality, and I think history shows that we can't just have a leap of faith," Wiener said. "The ISPs have violated net neutrality in the past and they will in the future. The economic pressure will be too great for them not to violate net neutrality, so we need to have some rules in place."<!-- excerpt -->
+> "They want us to just trust them to protect net neutrality, and I think history shows that we can't just have a leap of faith," Wiener said. "The ISPs have violated net neutrality in the past, and they will in the future. The economic pressure will be too great for them not to violate net neutrality, so we need to have some rules in place."<!-- excerpt -->
 
 I'm thrilled to see this bill making a comeback, compromises aside. The FCC totally abdicated their responsibility to protect customers from abuse by ISPs and states should move quickly to protect their residents and restore these freedoms.

src/posts/2018/fcc-calls-community-broadband-an-attack-on-free-speech.md

@@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ title: FCC calls community broadband an attack on free speech
 tag: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
 ---
 
-**[Techirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/10/30/fcc-falsely-declares-community-broadband-ominous-attack-free-speech/)**
+**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/10/30/fcc-falsely-declares-community-broadband-ominous-attack-free-speech/)**
 
 > ... ISPs could prevent this by simply offering better, faster, and cheaper service. But it's far easier and cheaper to try and buy laws restricting consumer rights, and to have your favorite public official mindlessly demonize something that is, at the end of the day, a legitimate, organic public response to a broadband competition and availability problem ISPs like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast would prefer regulators ignore.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/fcc-sucks-at-repealing-net-neutrality.md

@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
 
 **[Karl Bode, Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/2018/03/15/california-introduces-new-tougher-net-neutrality-rules-uses-ajit-pais-abdication-authority-against-fcc/)**
 
-> ... the FCC shot itself in the foot, and when it neutered its own authority over ISPs at Comcast, AT&T and Verizon's behest, it managed to also neuter its authority to pre-empt states from filling the void. Of course this could all be moot if the FCC loses its battle in court, but it's amusing all the same, and it's another example of how Ajit Pai and friends didn't really think this whole thing through.<!-- excerpt -->
+> ... the FCC shot itself in the foot, and when it neutered its own authority over ISPs at Comcast, AT&T and Verizon's behest, it managed to also neuter its authority to preempt states from filling the void. Of course this could all be moot if the FCC loses its battle in court, but it's amusing all the same, and it's another example of how Ajit Pai and friends didn't really think this whole thing through.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/net-neutrality-is-repealed-as-the-real-fight-for-it-begins.md

@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
 
 > So while many are understandably frustrated today, the elimination of the FCC's 2015 rules shouldn't be seen the end of net neutrality, or the end of the road. It's more like another chapter in a story that has neither a beginning nor an end. Net neutrality isn't something that simply "ends" with the creation or elimination of government guidelines. Net neutrality violations are only a symptom of a lack of competition in broadband and decades of regulatory capture.<!-- excerpt -->
 
-I'm disappointed, naturally, about the repeal of net neutrality, the fight is far from over. From here it moves to state houses and courts, with public opinion on its side. ISPs and their allies at the FCC overplayed their hand and underestimated public backlash to the repeal and I'd be surprised if they manage to win the fight ahead of them.
+I'm disappointed, naturally, about the repeal of net neutrality, the fight is far from over. From here it moves to state houses and courts, with public opinion on its side. ISPs and their allies at the FCC overplayed their hand and underestimated public backlash to the repeal, and I'd be surprised if they manage to win the fight ahead of them.

src/posts/2018/silos-centralization-and-censorship:-losing-the-promise-of-the-internet.md

@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ tags: ['politics']
 
 **[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180608/17022739996/silos-centralization-censorship-losing-promise-internet.shtml)**
 
-> For years we've been saying that it's time for us to rethink the internet, and move back towards a more decentralized, distributed world in which this kind of censorship isn't even an issue. It hasn't happened yet, but it feels like we're increasingly moving towards a world in which that's going to be necessary if we want to retain what is best about the internet.<!-- excerpt -->
+> For years, we've been saying that it's time for us to rethink the internet, and move back towards a more decentralized, distributed world in which this kind of censorship isn't even an issue. It hasn't happened yet, but it feels like we're increasingly moving towards a world in which that's going to be necessary if we want to retain what is best about the internet.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/time-to-break-up-facebook.md

@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ tags: ['politics', 'social media', 'privacy']
 > ...
 > "There's really nothing to stop Facebook from swallowing all of these verticals."
 > ...
-> "Unless you believe that we want one ruling master of all social networking and it should be Mark Zuckerberg… then there's no good reason not to break it up," he adds. "What's the argument against it?"
+> "Unless you believe that we want one ruling master of all social networking, and it should be Mark Zuckerberg… then there's no good reason not to break it up," he adds. "What's the argument against it?"