chore: replace include w/render

This commit is contained in:
Cory Dransfeldt 2024-02-09 09:50:30 -08:00
parent bb111f93e0
commit b92d49babf
No known key found for this signature in database
3 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ pagination:
reverse: true
alias: posts
---
{% if pagination.pageNumber == 0 %}{% include "partials/now/topper.liquid" status:status %}{% endif %}
{% if pagination.pageNumber == 0 %}
{% render "partials/now/topper.liquid" status:status %}
{% endif %}
{% for post in pagination.items %}
{% if post.data.published %}
<article class="h-entry">
@ -22,4 +24,4 @@ pagination:
</article>
{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
{% include "partials/paginator.liquid" %}
{% render "partials/paginator.liquid", pagination:pagination %}

View file

@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ image: /assets/img/ogi/links.jpg
{% endif -%}
</article>
{% endfor %}
{% include "partials/paginator.liquid" %}
{% render "partials/paginator.liquid", pagination:pagination %}

View file

@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ Maybe listening via playlists that are designed to fit a mood lets you move with
I don't change what I listen to all that much and it's rare that a new artist lands in my collection. I'm not as interested in a new band that sounds like an old one when I can go back and listen to the band that originated that sound. Maybe I'm just old (that's fine too!).
Streaming is, unarguably, convenient — but, it means you no longer have a collection you control. It means that what you can listen to is subject to the financial concerns of the streaming platform and it means that artists get paid less and less as streaming rates change. I don't have a compelling solution and, perhaps, one isn't needed given how widely adopted and accepted streaming is. I know I've lost interest in the model and I'm concerned for music (and media broadly) as it becomes commodified and availability remains a moving target.
Streaming is, unarguably, convenient — but, it means you no longer have a collection you control. It means that what you can listen to is subject to the financial concerns of the streaming platform and it means that artists get paid less and less as streaming rates change. I don't have a compelling solution and, perhaps, one isn't needed given how widely adopted and accepted streaming is. I know I've lost interest in the model and I'm concerned for music (and media broadly) as it becomes commodified and availability remains a moving target.