feat: refactor pagination implementation

src/posts/2018/americas-internet-freedom-rating-drops-following-net-neutrality-repeal.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-11-05
+draft: false
+title: America's internet freedom rating drops following net neutrality repeal
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Motherboard:](https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/pa979y/americas-internet-freedom-rating-dropped-due-to-the-repeal-of-net-neutrality)**
+
+> "Losing net neutrality impacts internet freedom because the open web is one of most powerful tools we have to hold leaders to account," [Josh] Tabish said. "Whether you're challenging tyranny or just saying something unpopular politically, net neutrality is essential for maintaining free speech online."<!-- excerpt -->
+>
+> ... in a country like the United States, we'd like to see our public information infrastructure getting more open and transparent, not less, and this year's report is a stark reminder of the direction we're heading in.

src/posts/2018/att-buying-web-based-ad-targeting-post.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-06-25
+draft: false
+title: AT&T buying web-based ad targeting company
+tags: ['net neutrality', 'privacy']
+---
+
+AT&T controlling your internet connection, the media you use it to consume and the means to target ads at you based on those habits is truly a nightmare.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+Run an adblocker. Run a VPN. Skip as much of their media as you can.
+
+_[Via Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1336343)_

src/posts/2018/att-ceo-criticizes-disparate-state-net-neutrality-regulations.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+date: 2018-11-13
+draft: false
+title: AT&T CEO criticizes disparate state net neutrality regulations after helping to dismantle unified, national rules
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Jon Brodkin:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1410725)**
+
+> "We've got a mess coming at us, literally states independently going out and designing their own privacy regulation," [Randall] Stephenson said. "How do you do business in a world where you have 50 different regulations and rules around privacy?"<!-- excerpt -->
+
+If Stephenson was actually concerned about the impact of a fractured regulatory landscape on his company, he could have left existing net neutrality rules in place. Rather he and other telecoms elected to force through a roughshod repeal of national rules without any consideration of public opinion or possible consequences.
+
+Any new national legislation backed by AT&T is likely to seriously disadvantage consumers and competitors and support net neutrality in name only.

src/posts/2018/automating-package-tracking-ios.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+---
+date: 2018-01-09
+draft: false
+title: Automating package tracking on iOS
+tags: ['automation', 'iOS']
+---
+
+I try to do as much shopping as I can online and a lot of the shopping I end up doing is through Amazon. This means I end up with quite a few order and shipping confirmation emails in my inbox.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+In an effort to cut down on manually managing and tracking all of these, I've begun maintaining a rule to auto-forward all emails I receive with tracking information to Junecloud's web service that backs their Deliveries[^1] app.
+
+In Gmail/Google apps, the rule syntax looks like the following:
+
+```
+subject:("SHIPPING EMAIL SUBJECT") OR subject:("SHIPPING EMAIL SUBJECT")
+```
+
+Emails matching that rule are then sent to track@junecloud.com and, provided the sending address matches the email associated with your Junecloud account, your packages will be automatically added to the Deliveries app. Now all of my deliveries are automatically tracked where they normally would be, without adding to the clutter in my inbox or my email workload.
+
+[^1]: Deliveries is available on [iOS](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/deliveries-a-package-tracker/id290986013) and [macOS](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/deliveries-a-package-tracker/id924726344)

src/posts/2018/avoiding-phishing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-01-06
+draft: false
+title: Avoiding phishing
+tags: ['security']
+---
+
+**[Rob Dodson:](http://robdodson.me/avoid-phishing/)**
+
+> Someone just tried to phish me and it made me want to put together a little guide to help you catch this stuff before it ruins your day.
+
+An excellent refresher on what to look out for to avoid phishing. Be careful out there.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/bill-could-give-californians-unprecedented-control-over-data.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-06-23
+draft: false
+title: Bill promises Californians more control over their data
+tags: ['politics', 'privacy']
+---
+
+**[Wired:](https://www.wired.com/story/new-privacy-bill-could-give-californians-unprecedented-control-over-data)**
+
+> ... the bill would allow California residents to find out what information businesses and data brokers collect about them, where that information comes from, and how it's shared. It would give people the power to ask for their data to be deleted and to order businesses to stop selling their personal information. It places limits on selling data on users younger than 16 years of age, and prohibits businesses from denying service to users for exercising their rights under the bill.
+
+I love the sound of this — hopefully it's not derailed like California's net neutrality bill was.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/blocking-similar-number-spam-calls.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-01-06
+draft: false
+title: Blocking spam calls from similar numbers on iOS
+tags: ['security']
+---
+
+I've been seeing more incoming spam calls from numbers similar to mine recently. They're annoying in large part because traditional iOS call blockers like [Hiya](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hiya-caller-id-and-block/id986999874?mt=8), [Nomorobo](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/nomorobo-robocall-blocking/id1134727588?mt=8) and so forth don't screen them out (these apps apparently due this to err on the side of caution and avoid blocking what they see as legitimate local calls).<!-- excerpt -->
+
+To mitigate this I've started using a simple app called [Wideprotect](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/wideprotect-block-call-sms-mms/id1171024059) that lets you block numbers by providing a set of digits for it to match against (e.g. your area code or your area code plus the first three numbers of the phone number). If you haven't tried the app yet and you're seeing the same issue, I'd _highly_ recommend giving it a try.

src/posts/2018/ca-governor-signs-nations-strictest-net-neutrality-law.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-09-30
+draft: false
+title: CA governor signs nation's strictest net neutrality law
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Wired:](https://www.wired.com/story/california-governor-signs-nations-toughest-net-neutrality-law/)**
+
+> The nation's largest state just adopted sweeping net neutrality protections, setting up a potential legal showdown with the Federal Communications Commission over the future of the internet. California Governor Jerry Brown Sunday signed a bill banning broadband providers such as AT&T and Comcast from blocking, throttling, or otherwise discriminating against lawful content passing through their networks.
+
+Fantastic news.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/ca-net-neutrality-bill-back-on-track.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-08-10
+draft: false
+title: CA net neutrality bill back on track
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Motherboard:](https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mb4x8y/californias-net-neutrality-bill-is-back-from-the-dead-with-the-help-of-its-biggest-detractor)**
+
+> The bill enshrines not only the fundamentals of net neutrality, such as prohibiting ISPs from throttling or blocking sites, but also prohibits other telecom trickery, such as zero rating—a practice where companies provide access to certain parts of the internet for "free" and charge for others.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+This is really heartening news, particularly the fact that it addresses anti-competitive practices like zero rating. I appreciate that the state government is taking up the challenge of addressing abuses by ISPs where the federal government has let things slide.

src/posts/2018/ca-net-neutrality-bill-makes-a-comeback.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-07-08
+draft: false
+title: CA net neutrality bill makes a comeback
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1340051)**
+
+> "They want us to just trust them to protect net neutrality, and I think history shows that we can't just have a leap of faith," Wiener said. "The ISPs have violated net neutrality in the past and they will in the future. The economic pressure will be too great for them not to violate net neutrality, so we need to have some rules in place."<!-- excerpt -->
+
+I'm thrilled to see this bill making a comeback, compromises aside. The FCC totally abdicated their responsibility to protect customers from abuse by ISPs and states should move quickly to protect their residents and restore these freedoms.

src/posts/2018/ca-senate-passes-net-neutrality-legislation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-01-30
+draft: false
+title: California state senate passes net neutrality legislation
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Jon Brodkin, Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1251427)**
+
+> The California State Senate yesterday approved a bill to impose net neutrality restrictions on Internet service providers, challenging the Federal Communications Commission attempt to preempt such rules.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+This is a positive first step and one that will, hopefully, be taken up and passed through the state house before being signed into law. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out with the FCC's language preemption language includes in their original order. Ideally it'll withstand inevitable legal challenges but, should it fail, the state government can always take the same approach other state have and bar ISPs violating net neutrality from receiving state contracts.

src/posts/2018/ca-senate-passes-strict-net-neutrality-law-in-defiance-of-isps.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-05-31
+draft: false
+title: CA senate passes strict net neutrality law in defiance of ISPs
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1316603)**
+
+> The California bill would replicate the US-wide bans on blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization that were implemented by the FCC in 2015, and it would go beyond the FCC rules with a ban on paid data-cap exemptions. California is one of several states trying to impose state-level net neutrality rules because the FCC's Republican leadership decided to eliminate the federal rules effective June 11.
+
+As a general rule, if something is good for ISPs, it's bad for their customers.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/california-approves-privacy-rules-opposed-by-isps-and-tech-companies.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-06-29
+draft: false
+title: California approves new online privacy rules
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1338303)**
+
+> Consumers would have the right to request all the data collected about them from a business up to twice a year, and businesses would be required to disclose the information free of charge. Consumers would have "the right to request that a business delete any PI about the consumer which the business has collected from the consumer."<!-- excerpt -->
+
+This is an excellent first step towards protecting consumer data as more and more companies shift towards monetizing private consumer information. Hopefully the net neutrality bill previously under consideration is ultimately able to pass as well.

src/posts/2018/california-passes-net-neutrality-bill.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-09-03
+draft: false
+title: California passes net neutrality bill
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[The EFF:](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/08/victory-california-passes-net-neutrality-bill)**
+
+> S.B. 822 bans blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization, classic ways that companies have violated net neutrality principles. It also incorporates much of what the FCC learned and incorporated into the 2015 Open Internet Order, preventing new assaults on the free and open Internet. This includes making sure companies can't circumvent net neutrality at the point of interconnection within the state of California.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/comcast-throttling-mobile-video-and-charging-extra-for-high-quality-streaming.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-07-03
+draft: false
+title: Comcast throttling mobile video and charging extra for high quality streaming
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1339243)**
+
+> Comcast's Xfinity Mobile service is imposing new speed limits on video watching and personal hotspot usage, and the company will start charging extra for high-definition video over the cellular network.
+
+That didn't take long. Who needs net neutrality anyways?<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/consolidation-swiftly-follows-the-death-of-net-neutrality.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+date: 2018-06-13
+draft: false
+title: Consolidation swiftly follows the death of net neutrality
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Comcast eyes Fox takeover](https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/gyk3xb/comcast-21st-century-fox-merger-net-neutrality)**
+
+> Combined with the death of net neutrality, the U.S. is creating a very uncertain future where a handful of companies now dominate everything from local sports and news broadcasts to broadband, with few rules or guidelines preventing price gouging, predatory practices, and routinely anti-competitive behavior.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+**[AT&T wins approval for Time Warner merger](https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/7xmm5z/att-time-warner-merger-consumer-protection)**
+
+> ... But when AT&T owns not only the content coming to your home, but the wireless and fixed-line connections this content travels over--higher prices are only part of the problem. With the death of net neutrality, AT&T has been given a green light to abuse this power to disadvantage competitors in an ocean of new, obnoxiously-creative ways.

src/posts/2018/don-t-pin-your-political-hopes-on-tech-giants.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-08-02
+draft: false
+title: Don't pin your political hopes on tech giants
+tags: ['politics']
+---
+
+**[The Outline:](https://theoutline.com/post/5408/facebook-donates-money-to-republicans-fyi)**
+
+> Elon Musk donates to Republicans, Facebook donates to Republicans. This doesn't excuse Musk, however. If anything, it should deepen the growing sense that Silicon Valley is concerned first and foremost with its continued survival and success, and doesn't give an iota of a damn about much else.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/facebook-is-not-sorry-it-only-wants-more-data.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+date: 2018-10-09
+draft: false
+title: "Facebook isn't sorry — it only wants more data"
+tags: ['social media', 'privacy']
+---
+
+**[Charlie Warzel:](https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/facebook-isnt-sorry-it-just-wants-your-data)**
+
+> We've already given it so much, why stop now? No one else is going to delete Facebook, so why should I? Facebook understands this — the data tells them so. It also tells them that slickly produced videos and contrite congressional testimony are small ways to ameliorate lingering public concern.
+>
+> But the real truth lies in the company's innovations and ambitions, products like Portal. Facebook doesn't really care. And maybe we don't either.
+
+[Delete Facebook.](https://deletefacebook.com)<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/fbi-once-again-compares-creating-encryption-back-doors-to-putting-a-man-on-the-moon.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+---
+date: 2018-07-25
+draft: false
+title: FBI once again compares creating encryption back doors to putting a man on the moon
+tags: ['politics', 'privacy']
+---
+
+**[Chris Wray, FBI Director:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180721/12074340282/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors.shtml)**
+
+> We're a country that has unbelievable innovation. We put a man on the moon. We have the power of flight. We have autonomous vehicles… [T]he idea that we can't solve this problem as a society -- I just don't buy it.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180721/12074340282/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors.shtml)**
+
+> The "compromise" Wray wants is simple: if law enforcement has a warrant, it gets access. The solution isn't. To weaken or backdoor encryption to serve law enforcement's needs makes everyone -- not just criminal suspects -- less safe. If a hole can be used by good guys, it can be used by bad guys. And even the best guys can't prevent their tech tools from making their way into the public domain
+
+**[Matt Blaze:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180721/12074340282/fbi-boss-chris-wray-we-put-man-moon-so-why-not-encryption-backdoors.shtml)**
+
+> "When I hear 'if we can put a man on the moon, we can do this' I'm hearing an analogy almost saying "if we can put a man on the moon, surely we can put a man on the sun.'"

src/posts/2018/fcc-admits-its-site-was-never-hacked.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-08-07
+draft: false
+title: FCC admits its site was never hacked
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Cory Doctorow:](https://boingboing.net/2018/08/07/hackers-ate-my-homework.html)**
+
+> No one seriously believed the FCC's hackers-ate-my-homework excuse, especially after the FCC refused to cooperate with law-enforcement agencies who wanted to investigate the supposed attack and stonewalling Congress on the details.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+> It was such radioactively obvious bullshit that the Government Accountability Office was summoned to investigate it. Now, days before the GAO is due to report its findings, Trump FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has come clean, admitting that the hack never, ever happened.

src/posts/2018/fcc-calls-community-broadband-an-attack-on-free-speech.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-11-05
+draft: false
+title: FCC calls community broadband an attack on free speech
+tag: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Techirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181029/08271540934/fcc-falsely-declares-community-broadband-ominous-attack-free-speech.shtml)**
+
+> ... ISPs could prevent this by simply offering better, faster, and cheaper service. But it's far easier and cheaper to try and buy laws restricting consumer rights, and to have your favorite public official mindlessly demonize something that is, at the end of the day, a legitimate, organic public response to a broadband competition and availability problem ISPs like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast would prefer regulators ignore.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/fcc-chairman-boosts-telecom-companies,-throws-silicon-valley-under-the-bus.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-09-05
+draft: false
+title: FCC chairman boosts telecom companies, throws Silicon Valley under the bus
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180904/09353340576/ajit-pai-coddles-big-telecom-demonizes-silicon-valley.shtml)**
+
+> There's absolutely a legitimate conversation to be had here in terms of what to do about privacy and speech in the Facebook and Twitter era. And that may or may not involve crafting new regulations. But it might be nice if people wised up to the fact that a huge swath of the conversation is being dictated not by parties acting in good faith with a genuine eye on valid solutions, but by telecom monopolies eager to pee in the discourse pool simply to fatten their wallets.<!-- excerpt -->
+> ...
+> From ISPs efforts to charge customers more for privacy to using bullshit fees to jack up your bill, Pai never bats an eyelash when AT

src/posts/2018/fcc-isps-grapple-with-net-neutrality-challenges.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+---
+date: 2018-03-12
+draft: false
+title: FCC, ISPs grapple with net neutrality challenges
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Jon Brodkin, Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1274035)**
+
+> Twelve lawsuits filed against the Federal Communications Commission over its net neutrality repeal have been consolidated into one suit that will be heard at a federal appeals court in California.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+> The 12 lawsuits were filed by more than three dozen entities, including state attorneys general, consumer advocacy groups, and tech companies.
+
+**[Karl Bode, techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180307/09452639377/telecom-lobbyists-whine-about-state-net-neutrality-efforts-they-helped-create.shtml)**
+
+> Granted having disparate state-level protections may in some ways be cumbersome, but that's again something ISPs like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast should have thought a little harder about before killing extremely popular and modest (by international standards) federal protections. Large ISP lobbyists created this mess and, unsurprisingly, they're simply refusing to own it.
+
+I would've loved to see the FCC net neutrality repeal fail, but seeing proponents of the repeal grapple with the fallout of running roughshod over the public during the repeal process has been pretty satisfying. None of these ISPs appear to realize how unpopular they are and what they're pushing for is. I want net neutrality enshrined in legislation, but any bill ISPs or their lobbyists are involved in writing would preserve net neutrality in name only.

src/posts/2018/fcc-strategically-delays-finalizing-net-neutrality-repeal.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+date: 2018-04-24
+draft: false
+title: FCC strategically delays finalizing net neutrality repeal
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Jon Brodkin, Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1298263)**
+
+> Pai has been fond of saying that the net neutrality repeal hasn't harmed consumers, but that's a pretty low bar to clear given that the rules are still in effect.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+> If the rules were eliminated this week and ISPs began violating net neutrality while Congress is negotiating a permanent net neutrality law, it would be harder for Republicans to force Democrats to compromise, Feld said. "This has all been about trying to push Democrats to compromise and adopt weak legislation."
+
+This all reads like a textbook case of regulatory capture. Of course ISPs will abuse their market positions when this is repealed and they should have absolutely no input on net neutrality legislation.
+
+Fortunately, [states like California are leading the way with their own net neutrality laws](http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-net-neutrality-california-20180420-story.html), but that's only if said laws manage to hold up to inevitable legal challenges of their own.

src/posts/2018/fcc-sucks-at-repealing-net-neutrality.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-03-15
+draft: false
+title: The FCC sucks at repealing net neutrality
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Karl Bode, Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180314/10090139425/california-introduces-new-tougher-net-neutrality-rules-uses-ajit-pais-abdication-authority-against-fcc.shtml)**
+
+> ... the FCC shot itself in the foot, and when it neutered its own authority over ISPs at Comcast, AT&T and Verizon's behest, it managed to also neuter its authority to pre-empt states from filling the void. Of course this could all be moot if the FCC loses its battle in court, but it's amusing all the same, and it's another example of how Ajit Pai and friends didn't really think this whole thing through.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/fort-collins-municipal-broadband.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+date: 2018-01-03
+draft: false
+title: Fort Collins votes in favor of municipal broadband
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Jon Brodkin, Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1239167)**
+
+> While the Federal Communications Commission has voted to eliminate the nation's net neutrality rules, the municipal broadband network will be neutral and without data caps.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+> "The network will deliver a 'net-neutral' competitive unfettered data offering that does not impose caps or usage limits on one use of data over another (i.e., does not limit streaming or charge rates based on type of use)," a new planning document says. "All application providers (data, voice, video, cloud services) are equally able to provide their services, and consumers' access to advanced data opens up the marketplace."
+
+I sincerely hope more cities push to create their own, neutral networks now that the FCC has abdicated its responsibility to protect consumers from abuses by private, monopolistic ISPs.

src/posts/2018/fugazi-turnover-live-1991.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-11-10
+draft: false
+title: Fugazi - Turnover (Live 1991)
+tags: ['music', 'Fugazi']
+---
+
+<iframe class="aspect-video w-full" allowFullScreen="allowFullScreen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gzC0RNkBXM0?ecver=1&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;rel=0&amp;yt:stretch=16:9&amp;autohide=1&amp;color=red&amp;" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0"></iframe>
+
+Absolutely classic.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/generating-jekyll-posts-using-drafts-and-working-copy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+date: 2018-04-22
+draft: false
+title: Generating Jekyll posts using Drafts and Working Copy
+tags: ['iOS', 'Javascript', 'automation']
+---
+
+I put together a script that will take a draft, grab the title and body and then prompt you for front matter data before sending the completed post off to [Working Copy](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/id896694807?at=11lvuD). It's specific to my site, and purposes, but [it should be fairly straightforward and easy to adapt to your needs.](https://actions.getdrafts.com/a/1GO)<!-- excerpt -->
+
+When you first run the action, it'll ask you for your repo name, posts path and Working Copy x-callback-url token. This info will be stored in [Drafts](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/id1236254471?at=11lvuD) and used to write out the correct file.
+
+Site categories and tags are expected to be space delimited and are split out and mapped over to parse them into the proper format.
+
+Post dates are pre-populated with the current date and that same date is combined with the draft file to generate the file name that's specified when first running the action.

src/posts/2018/google-tracks-user-location-even-after-they-opt-out.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+date: 2018-08-13
+draft: false
+title: Google tracks user location — even after they opt out
+tags: ['privacy']
+---
+
+**[The AP:](https://apnews.com/f60bc112665b458cb6473d7ee9492932)**
+
+> Even with Location History paused, some Google apps automatically store time-stamped location data without asking.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+> For example, Google stores a snapshot of where you are when you merely open its Maps app.
+
+This isn't at all surprising. Google's business consists of monetizing data provided to it by its users — if you're not comfortable with that, the only real fix is to stop using Google's services altogether.

src/posts/2018/move-slow-break-nothing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-01-31
+draft: false
+title: Move slow and break nothing
+tags: ['development']
+---
+
+**[Danny Crichton, TechCrunch:](https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/27/move-slow-and-break-nothing/)**
+
+> For everyone, but particularly software engineers: let's get back to basics. It's better to have more reliable but less features than more features that are breaking every other day. Let's move slow and break nothing.
+
+Reliability and stability are features. Focus on them.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/net-neutrality-is-repealed-as-the-real-fight-for-it-begins.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-06-11
+draft: false
+title: Net neutrality is repealed as the real fight for it begins
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180611/08382240010/net-neutrality-rules-die-today-backlash-is-just-getting-started.shtml)**
+
+> So while many are understandably frustrated today, the elimination of the FCC's 2015 rules shouldn't be seen the end of net neutrality, or the end of the road. It's more like another chapter in a story that has neither a beginning nor an end. Net neutrality isn't something that simply "ends" with the creation or elimination of government guidelines. Net neutrality violations are only a symptom of a lack of competition in broadband and decades of regulatory capture.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+I'm disappointed, naturally, about the repeal of net neutrality, the fight is far from over. From here it moves to state houses and courts, with public opinion on its side. ISPs and their allies at the FCC overplayed their hand and underestimated public backlash to the repeal and I'd be surprised if they manage to win the fight ahead of them.

src/posts/2018/oig-report-fcc-lied-about-being-hacked.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+date: 2018-08-08
+draft: false
+title: 'OIG report: FCC lied about being hacked'
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Cory Doctorow:](https://boingboing.net/2018/08/08/lying-about-lying.html)**
+
+> The OIG report shows that Pai knew from the start that the story of a hack-attack was unsupported by evidence and disputed by experts -- we knew that too, because those experts were speaking publicly at the time, but it's great to see it in official black-and-white.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+> It also shows that Pai was informed in advance that John Oliver was about to put out a very public, high-profile call for comments, and that Pai did not inform his IT staff to expect this surge, virtually guaranteeing that the website would crash.
+
+**[Ars Technica:](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/08/fcc-lied-to-congress-about-made-up-ddos-attack-investigation-found/)**
+
+> "[W]e determined the FCC, relying on Bray's explanation of the events, misrepresented facts and provided misleading responses to Congressional inquiries related to this incident," the IG's report said."

src/posts/2018/panoply-announces-ad-targeting-for-podcasts.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-08-02
+draft: false
+title: Panoply announces ad targeting for podcasts
+tags: ['privacy']
+---
+
+**[Panoply:](https://twitter.com/Panoply/status/1024311223083520001)**
+
+> For the first time in podcasting, target your audience by demographic, interests, purchase behavior and more..<!-- excerpt -->
+
+The last thing we need is the ad industry co-opting podcasts to enable more invasive tracking. No thanks.

src/posts/2018/popular-sites-support-long-shot-effort-to-save-net-neutrality.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-05-08
+draft: false
+title: Popular sites support long-shot effort to save net neutrality
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Wired:](https://www.wired.com/story/your-favorite-websites-are-rallying-in-a-last-ditch-effort-to-save-net-neutrality)**
+
+> The measure would still face long odds, however. Republicans, who tend to support the FCC’s move to repeal net neutrality, hold a solid majority in the House of Representatives. If it were to pass the House, the measure would also need the signature of President Trump or a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress to override a veto.
+
+I sincerely doubt that this effort will amount to anything, but it's nice to see prominent companies and legislators continuing to fight in favor of net neutrality.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/popular-tech-companies-work-to-stop-california-privacy-law.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-06-26
+draft: false
+title: Popular tech companies work to stop California privacy law
+tags: ['politics', 'privacy']
+---
+
+**[The Intercept:](https://theintercept.com/2018/06/26/google-and-facebook-are-quietly-fighting-californias-privacy-rights-initiative-emails-reveal/)**
+
+> The idea that Californians might gain sweeping new privacy rights has spooked Silicon Valley, internet service providers, and other industries that increasingly rely on data collection, leading to a lobbying push to defeat the initiative before it gains traction.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+Laws like this are becoming increasingly necessary to safeguard personal information as more and more companies make money by monetizing user data handed over to them. None of the companies covered by this law have demonstrated that they deserve the benefit of the doubt when handling sensitive information.

src/posts/2018/senators-press-wireless-carriers-on-mobile-throttling.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-11-15
+draft: false
+title: Senators press wireless carriers on mobile throttling
+tags: ['politics', 'net neutrality']
+---
+
+**[Jon Brodkin:](https://arstechnica.com/?p=1412375)**
+
+> "All online traffic should be treated equally, and Internet service providers should not discriminate against particular content or applications for competitive advantage purposes or otherwise."<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/silos-centralization-and-censorship:-losing-the-promise-of-the-internet.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+date: 2018-06-23
+draft: false
+title: Silos and centralization on the internet
+tags: ['politics']
+---
+
+**[Techdirt:](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180608/17022739996/silos-centralization-censorship-losing-promise-internet.shtml)**
+
+> For years we've been saying that it's time for us to rethink the internet, and move back towards a more decentralized, distributed world in which this kind of censorship isn't even an issue. It hasn't happened yet, but it feels like we're increasingly moving towards a world in which that's going to be necessary if we want to retain what is best about the internet.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/the-bullshit-web.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+---
+date: 2018-07-31
+draft: false
+title: The Bullshit Web
+tags: ['development']
+---
+
+**[Nick Heer:](https://pxlnv.com/blog/bullshit-web/)**
+
+> An honest web is one in which the overwhelming majority of the code and assets downloaded to a user's computer are used in a page's visual presentation, with nearly all the remainder used to define the semantic structure and associated metadata on the page. Bullshit — in the form of CPU-sucking surveillance, unnecessarily-interruptive elements, and behaviours that nobody responsible for a website would themselves find appealing as a visitor — is unwelcome and intolerable.
+> Death to the bullshit web.<!-- excerpt -->

src/posts/2018/the-copenhagen-letter.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+---
+date: 2018-09-06
+draft: false
+title: The Copenhagen Letter
+tags: ['politics']
+---
+
+> Tech is not above us. It should be governed by all of us, by our democratic institutions. It should play by the rules of our societies. It should serve our needs, both individual and collective, as much as our wants.<!-- excerpt -->
+>
+> Progress is more than innovation. We are builders at heart. Let us create a new Renaissance. We will open and nourish honest public conversation about the power of technology. We are ready to serve our societies. We will apply the means at our disposal to move our societies and their institutions forward.
+>
+> Let us build from trust. Let us build for true transparency. We need digital citizens, not mere consumers. We all depend on transparency to understand how technology shapes us, which data we share, and who has access to it. Treating each other as commodities from which to extract maximum economic value is bad, not only for society as a complex, interconnected whole but for each and every one of us.
+>
+> Design open to scrutiny. We must encourage a continuous, public, and critical reflection on our definition of success as it defines how we build and design for others. We must seek to design with those for whom we are designing. We will not tolerate design for addiction, deception, or control. We must design tools that we would love our loved ones to use. We must question our intent and listen to our hearts.
+>
+> Let us move from human-centered design to humanity-centered design.
+>
+> We are a community that exerts great influence. We must protect and nurture the potential to do good with it. We must do this with attention to inequality, with humility, and with love. In the end, our reward will be to know that we have done everything in our power to leave our garden patch a little greener than we found it.

src/posts/2018/time-to-break-up-facebook.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+date: 2018-09-04
+draft: false
+title: Time to break up Facebook
+tags: ['politics', 'social media', 'privacy']
+---
+
+**[The Verge:](https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/4/17816572/tim-wu-facebook-regulation-interview-curse-of-bigness-antitrust)**
+
+> ... the chilling effect of Facebook and other tech giants buying up every promising startup is noticeable. "I think if we have a tech economy entirely premised on the idea that monopolists may one day buy the underlying thing, it really limits what can happen," says Wu.<!-- excerpt -->
+> ...
+> "Facebook sits down with someone and says, 'We could steal the functionality and bring it into the mothership, or you could sell to us at this distressed price.'"
+> ...
+> "There's really nothing to stop Facebook from swallowing all of these verticals."
+> ...
+> "Unless you believe that we want one ruling master of all social networking and it should be Mark Zuckerberg… then there's no good reason not to break it up," he adds. "What's the argument against it?"

src/posts/2018/u.s.-cell-carriers-want-to-help-manager-your-identity-online.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+date: 2018-09-15
+draft: false
+title: U.S. cell carriers want to help manager your identity online
+tags: ['privacy']
+---
+
+**[Jon Brodkin:](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/09/att-and-verizon-want-to-manage-your-identity-across-websites-and-apps/)**
+
+> But do you want your carrier managing your logins across the websites and apps you use on your phone?
+
+No — absolutely not.<!-- excerpt -->
+
+> "The carriers have a dismal track record of authenticating the user," Weaver also said. "If the carriers were trustworthy, I think this would be unequivocally a good idea. The problem is I don't trust the carriers."

src/posts/2018/vermont-passes-law-regulating-data-brokers.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+date: 2018-05-27
+draft: false
+title: Vermont passes law regulating data brokers
+tags: ['politics', 'privacy']
+---
+
+**[Gizmodo:](https://gizmodo.com/vermont-passes-first-of-its-kind-law-to-regulate-data-b-1826359383)**
+
+> ... under the guidelines of the bill—which passed into law Tuesday without the signature of Republican Governor Phil Scott—data brokers will have to pay a $100 annual fee to register with the state, and will have to comply with new rules meant to protect Vermonters from suffering at the hands of another data breach like the one that befell Equifax last year and exposed the data of 145 million (and counting) Americans.
+
+This sounds like the kind of law that should also exist at the federal level to benefit everyone. Data brokers are terrible companies that make money by exposing and endangering everyone's personal information.<!-- excerpt -->